Tuesday, April 17, 2012

153 FISH


153 is my favourite number.

I understand that that is a strange statement for a lot of people to hear.  It is strange because they think that I just pulled it out of the air, and maybe I’m trying to be funny or something.  Then it’s kind of awkward, because hey, that’s not funny.

I don’t know enough about numerology to appreciate or express all of the unique qualities of this fabulous number, but let me just give you a few examples that might help to explain why even someone with my limited understanding would choose this number to be a favourite.
  • It is a triangle number.  The 17th to be exact    1 + 2 + 3... + 17 = 153
  • It is the sum of the first 5 factorials    1! + 2! + 3! + 4! + 5! = 153
  • It is a hexagonal number,( the 9th)
  • It is a truncated triangle number, (meaning that 1, 15, and 153 are all triangle numbers)
  • It is divisible by the sum of its own digits    153 / (1 + 5 + 3) = 17
  • The sum of its digits is a perfect square    1 + 5 + 3 = 9 = 32
  • The sum of its divisors is also a perfect square       1 + 3 + 9 + 17 + 51 = 81 = 92

Now, I know what you’re thinking.  “Enough already!  These are all extremely rare qualities, how is this possible?!  This number is incredible!”  No?  Ok, well then perhaps you would be willing to do an experiment:

·         Pick any number that is divisible by 3.  (You can tell if a number is divisible by 3 if you add up all of the digits, and the sum is divisible by 3)
o   For example, I’ll pick... 81
·         Separate it into its individual digits
o   8; 1
·         Cube each one, and add them together
o   83 + 13 = 512 + 1 = 513
·         Repeat steps 2 and 3
o   53 + 13 + 33 = 153
o   13 + 53+ 33 = 153

If you’ve done it right, you will end up at 153.  EVERY TIME.  And as if that's not enough, the term used to describe our little experiment?  The Trinity function!  If that doesn't blow your mind a little bit, then we probably wouldn't be very good friends. 
 
Alright, I think I’ve gotten my nerd on enough for one day; but let me just tell you what got me asking questions about this number in the first place.  John 21:11, “So Simon Peter went aboard and hauled the net ashore, full of large fish, 153 of them.  And although there were so many, the net was not torn.” 

Sometimes even the things that seem like the smallest details can be full of meaning and mystery.  Why did they stop to count the fish?  Why did they write that number down and record it in the pages of Scripture?  Surely saying, “there was an unusually large number of fish”, or, "wow, what a catch!", or, "who knew all the fish in the sea would be gathered on the other side of the boat?", would have sufficed.  What is it about this number that the Holy Spirit wanted it in that passage?  What else is he telling us?

There are many more interesting qualities about the number 153 that I haven’t brought up here, but I hope that this post has whet your appetite a little bit for this passage of Scripture, this incredible number, and the little details that so often get overlooked.  Thanks for reading.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Electronic Drums


So, I had an opportunity yesterday to play on an electronic drum kit, and I thought I would take a minute to talk about it.  I’ve played electronic kits before, but yesterday was a real jam, as opposed to just messing around, which of course makes it a vastly different experience.  And for the record, this was a pretty good kit – so it’s not like I took a couple of whacks on a kids toy from Wal-Mart, and now I want to rant about it.  When we were done practicing, the owner of the kit – Dave Stroeve, (affectionately known as Super Dave, because he is awesome), asked me what I thought of it.  So, for all of those who consistently wonder; here is why I don’t play an electronic drum kit:
  • First of all – and this is really the biggest issue for me – there is very little dynamic with an electronic drum kit.  By dynamic – I mostly mean volume control.   With an acoustic kit, the harder I hit it, the louder the sound; but an electronic kit has a ceiling, and it’s a pretty low one.  If the spectrum of what I can do on an acoustic kit is on a scale from 1 – 100; the electronic kit captures from about 10 – 50.  In other words, it doesn’t pick up the really light things like ghost notes, and accents; and when I’m trying to build to 70 or 80, it’s still stuck at 50 and there’s nothing I can do about it.  I feel like this is a vital component of my playing, and it’s an aspect that I really enjoy.
  • It doesn’t catch everything.  Now, I’ve already mentioned that it doesn’t catch the lightest touches, so I’m not talking about that.  (Side note – this is controlled with the “threshold” setting, but even on the lowest threshold setting there are things that are missed).  My point here is that it’s simply not fast enough.  If I want to do a roll, I want to be able to hear every hit; and the technology is just not there yet.
  • The feel of the cymbals.  Props to the work that has been done to make the snare and toms feel like they’re real, but there’s a long way to go on the cymbals. 
  • The sound.  I realize that there is an extremely wide range of sounds that can come from an electronic kit, but at the end of the day, the digital kit just doesn’t sound as good or as full as genuine maple or birch. 
All that being said, I am not opposed to electronic drums.  I just think that we need to take them for what they are.  Just as an electronic keyboard won’t replace a grand piano – electronic drums won’t replace my Yamaha Birch Custom’s.  But they do have an application, and I think that they have much to offer.  A few advantages:
  • Volume control.  If you are playing for eight people in a living room, electronic drums could be very useful for you.  You can play without fear of drowning out the other instruments or the vocals, or causing permanent damage to your listener’s eardrums.   For this reason, they could also be very useful for practicing at home, especially for people who are just starting out on the drums. 
  • Compact and low maintenance.  This is great for practicing and for beginners.  Learning how to set up your drums and tune them takes time.  Electronic drums are basically good to go right out of the box... or bag, or case, or whatever they come in; and they take up a minimal amount of room in your valuable jam space.
  • The wide range of sounds.  Again, if we think of the comparison between a keyboard and a piano, the reverse is also true.  An acoustic drum kit can’t perform all the functions of an electronic kit.  The sounds and effects that you have at your fingertips are amazing.  So much so that I think an electronic kit could actually be a great addition to a band that had an acoustic kit.

Conclusion - electronic drums should not be thought of as a replacement for acoustic drums, but rather as an entirely different (albeit closely related) musical instrument.  If we are trying to use them to completely replace acoustic drums, they will always be a failure; but if we can appreciate them for what they are, then I think we might be pleasantly surprised at the potential that they have.  I, for one, would like to spend some more time learning how to play on an electronic kit; and I would be especially happy to do so in conjunction with an acoustic kit.  I think that to play alongside an acoustic kit would relieve me of the ‘duty’ to supply the main beat and free me up to explore the potential of a new instrument.